Hi Everyone:
Back in March I talked about oil prices. Now I can't believe that Americans are not hanging out of their windows and screaming, I am mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!
Just in the past 6 weeks or so the price of gasoline has increased almost $.75/gallon. Now let's review what happened about a year ago. We were all told that India and China were using a lot more gas to fuel their economic development and consequently demand was higher and supply was lower. Well we all know now that that wasn't really the case and that speculators were the real culprits in the extraordinary increase in the prices. One year ago, a barrel of oil was selling for $148.00 with the price of gas a little over $4.00 per gallon. Today the cost of a oil is around $75.00 per barrel. That is almost 50% less than a year ago. BUT, the price of gas is closing in at $3.00 per gallon. WHAT? By my math if $148/barrel of oil equates to $4.00+/gallon of gas then $75/barrel of oil should equate to about $2.00/gallon of gas. There is a huge problem here! Doesn't anyone else see this?
Let's further review the differences between now and a year ago. We are now in the worst recession since the great depression of 1929 which lasted for years afterwards. In our current recession, millions of people have been laid off from their jobs which means that there are fewer people commuting to work and people are doing less driving period. It has been published in numerous media outlets that we, as a country, are using a lot less gasoline. Let's also not forget that this current recession is a global one and not just affecting our country. The global economic factor is lowering the global consumption of gasoline/oil. Less global consumption means less demand which equates to a larger supply. This all means that the price of gas (or the price of oil) should not be increasing. If anything, the prices should be decreasing. Six months ago when the OPEC members lowered their production, the prices kept sliding.
Now though it seems that it is business as usual for the oil companies and probably the speculators that the summer driving season means higher prices. It is very apparent that greed rules supreme and damn the people who can hardly afford to live (due to the massive layoffs). Again I repeat, why aren't people mad as hell about the price of gas? It is evident that common sense looses out to greed every time. This is wrong at every level.
Til next week.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Car and truck bumpers
Hi Everyone:
Sometimes I think of things and wonder why no one else thought of it. Today I am talking about car and truck bumpers. Not the strength of bumpers, but rather the height of front and rear bumpers. Yes the height. Why? That's a good question.
If you really gave it some thought, all bumpers should be the same height. Not just car vs car bumpers, but all bumpers of all vehicles should be the exact same height. Therefore a tractor trailer would not be able to go over the bumper of a smaller car it hits in front of it. Similarly, SUV's also then would not be able to go up and over the bumper of a smaller car it hits in front of it. The same would hold true for both front and rear end collisions.
Common sense tells me that if bumpers on all vehicles were the same height, a lot of lives (drivers and/or passengers) could conceivably be saved who are involved in these kind of accidents. It would seem that the easiest way to achieve the same height would be to lower the height of bumpers on the larger vehicles such as large cars, SUV's, vans, trucks and tractor trailers. Then when there is an accident different size vehicles would at the very least hit bumper to bumper and not have the larger vehicle ride up on the smaller one.
Cars and trucks have been manufactured for over 100 years and you would think that someone would have thought of this idea before. They certainly have had enough time to solve this problem. The solution is simplicity at its best and does make common sense. Let's also not forget that with higher fuel prices and increases in greenhouse gases of greater concern, it is inevitable that there will be a greater number of smaller vehicles on the roads and they need all the protection that they can get with these type of collisions. I wonder why this isn't so?
I understand why manufacturers are not presently addressing this problem, but hopefully will be in the near future.
Til next time.
Sometimes I think of things and wonder why no one else thought of it. Today I am talking about car and truck bumpers. Not the strength of bumpers, but rather the height of front and rear bumpers. Yes the height. Why? That's a good question.
If you really gave it some thought, all bumpers should be the same height. Not just car vs car bumpers, but all bumpers of all vehicles should be the exact same height. Therefore a tractor trailer would not be able to go over the bumper of a smaller car it hits in front of it. Similarly, SUV's also then would not be able to go up and over the bumper of a smaller car it hits in front of it. The same would hold true for both front and rear end collisions.
Common sense tells me that if bumpers on all vehicles were the same height, a lot of lives (drivers and/or passengers) could conceivably be saved who are involved in these kind of accidents. It would seem that the easiest way to achieve the same height would be to lower the height of bumpers on the larger vehicles such as large cars, SUV's, vans, trucks and tractor trailers. Then when there is an accident different size vehicles would at the very least hit bumper to bumper and not have the larger vehicle ride up on the smaller one.
Cars and trucks have been manufactured for over 100 years and you would think that someone would have thought of this idea before. They certainly have had enough time to solve this problem. The solution is simplicity at its best and does make common sense. Let's also not forget that with higher fuel prices and increases in greenhouse gases of greater concern, it is inevitable that there will be a greater number of smaller vehicles on the roads and they need all the protection that they can get with these type of collisions. I wonder why this isn't so?
I understand why manufacturers are not presently addressing this problem, but hopefully will be in the near future.
Til next time.
Sunday, June 7, 2009
Bill O'Reilly
Hi Everyone:
Well it happened again. Another public figure, this time TV personality, Bill O'Reilly used his platform to talk to millions of people without using any common sense what-so-ever!
Today's post isn't about whether one is for or against abortion. It is about public figures thinking they can say anything they want without any consequences. This is what happened. Since 2005, O'Reilly had talked about abortion provider and Kansas resident, Dr. George Tiller 29 times on his TV show, The O'Reilly Factor. O'Reilly actually used Dr. Tiller's name each time he talked about him. Salon's Gabriel Winant wrote that, "O'Reilly didn't tell anyone to do any violence against the doctor, but he did put the doctor in the public eye and helped make him the focus of a movement with a history of violence against these kinds of targets." O'Reilly even went so far as to call Dr. Tiller, "Tiller the baby killer!" So what was the consequence of O'Reilly's venom against the doctor? Dr. Tiller was murdered in cold blood while he was in his church.
Frank Schaeffer, who with his father Francis in the 1980's said that force could sometimes be justified in fighting abortions, wrote in The Huffington Post that he and the religious right "all contributed to this killing by our foolish words. I am very sorry." The Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz wrote about the online commentary that O'Reilly bears some responsibility for the killing but said he wasn't going to join the attack.
O'Reilly himself said this about Tiller's killing that "quick-thinking Americans" should condemn it. O'Reilly's incendiary words about Dr. Tiller lead to his murder. The Fox News host, O'Reilly and maybe even Fox News should definitely be held accountable for his words and to question whether he had gone to far in personally assailing Dr. Tiller time and time again for years. I think that O'Reilly should be charged with accessory to murder.
If O'Reilly had used common sense, he wouldn't have named Dr. Tiller and where he lived. O'Reilly has the right to voice his anti-abortion views but not in the way he did. I believe that there is a law against someone yelling fire in a crowded place and there should be a law against how O'Reilly used a person's name and address. Because O'Reilly failed to use any hint of common sense in what he said, it lead to the death of a human being. This is just so wrong on any level. I hope the authorities do hold O'Reilly accountable. Freedom of speech can go only so far!
Till next week.
Well it happened again. Another public figure, this time TV personality, Bill O'Reilly used his platform to talk to millions of people without using any common sense what-so-ever!
Today's post isn't about whether one is for or against abortion. It is about public figures thinking they can say anything they want without any consequences. This is what happened. Since 2005, O'Reilly had talked about abortion provider and Kansas resident, Dr. George Tiller 29 times on his TV show, The O'Reilly Factor. O'Reilly actually used Dr. Tiller's name each time he talked about him. Salon's Gabriel Winant wrote that, "O'Reilly didn't tell anyone to do any violence against the doctor, but he did put the doctor in the public eye and helped make him the focus of a movement with a history of violence against these kinds of targets." O'Reilly even went so far as to call Dr. Tiller, "Tiller the baby killer!" So what was the consequence of O'Reilly's venom against the doctor? Dr. Tiller was murdered in cold blood while he was in his church.
Frank Schaeffer, who with his father Francis in the 1980's said that force could sometimes be justified in fighting abortions, wrote in The Huffington Post that he and the religious right "all contributed to this killing by our foolish words. I am very sorry." The Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz wrote about the online commentary that O'Reilly bears some responsibility for the killing but said he wasn't going to join the attack.
O'Reilly himself said this about Tiller's killing that "quick-thinking Americans" should condemn it. O'Reilly's incendiary words about Dr. Tiller lead to his murder. The Fox News host, O'Reilly and maybe even Fox News should definitely be held accountable for his words and to question whether he had gone to far in personally assailing Dr. Tiller time and time again for years. I think that O'Reilly should be charged with accessory to murder.
If O'Reilly had used common sense, he wouldn't have named Dr. Tiller and where he lived. O'Reilly has the right to voice his anti-abortion views but not in the way he did. I believe that there is a law against someone yelling fire in a crowded place and there should be a law against how O'Reilly used a person's name and address. Because O'Reilly failed to use any hint of common sense in what he said, it lead to the death of a human being. This is just so wrong on any level. I hope the authorities do hold O'Reilly accountable. Freedom of speech can go only so far!
Till next week.
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Coupons
Hi Everyone:
During these hard economic times, I have been surprised that there are a lot of people who do not use coupons. Why doesn't everyone use coupons? I don't get it. There is absolutely nothing to lose and money to be gained by using coupons.
My local grocery stores doubles the value of coupons worth up to $.99. Therefore if you have a manufacturers coupon for $.75, you get $1.50 off that product. Now in addition to that $1.50 off, if you have a store coupon worth say $.50, that doubles to $1.00. Combine the two coupons and that means you get $2.50 off that product. Depending on the price of the product, you may even get the product for free. How can you beat free? But still, I witness a lot of people at the check out at grocery stores and they don't use any coupons. Why? How hard is it to cut out coupons in the coupon flyers? Even if you don't get a newspaper, there are web sites where you can print out coupons. How much easier can it get? I get the newspaper every day of the week and I am able to save enough money through the use of the coupons I find that it pays for the yearly subscription. In my case, using coupons each week, equates to a free newspaper each and every day and even delivered to our house to boot! If you save say $5.00 each week at the grocery store, that translates into $250.00 per year. Use more coupons, save even more money.
Walmart's business has done extremely well during these hard times by using a business plan that fits perfectly in these times by having low prices. Their business plan now includes increasing their grocery items. Now subtract the use of coupons on those low prices and voila, those prices are even lower and affordable. You just can't lose.
I have also recently noticed that there are even more and more coupons in flyers for restaurants to entice people to eat at their establishments. These include chain restaurants as well as local places. During down economic times, people will not go out to eat as much as they did previously. Except for using coupons at restaurants for a date, in a new relationship, using coupons makes eating out more affordable. How can you lose?
There are even coupons for maintenance for your car. The coupons include: oil changes, transmission flushes, brakes and mufflers etc. Why pay $29.00 or higher for an oil change when you can pay $18.00?
To me it is a no brainer to use coupons at every available opportunity. It is just common sense to use them.
Til next week. Remember using common sense makes sense and can even save you cents!
During these hard economic times, I have been surprised that there are a lot of people who do not use coupons. Why doesn't everyone use coupons? I don't get it. There is absolutely nothing to lose and money to be gained by using coupons.
My local grocery stores doubles the value of coupons worth up to $.99. Therefore if you have a manufacturers coupon for $.75, you get $1.50 off that product. Now in addition to that $1.50 off, if you have a store coupon worth say $.50, that doubles to $1.00. Combine the two coupons and that means you get $2.50 off that product. Depending on the price of the product, you may even get the product for free. How can you beat free? But still, I witness a lot of people at the check out at grocery stores and they don't use any coupons. Why? How hard is it to cut out coupons in the coupon flyers? Even if you don't get a newspaper, there are web sites where you can print out coupons. How much easier can it get? I get the newspaper every day of the week and I am able to save enough money through the use of the coupons I find that it pays for the yearly subscription. In my case, using coupons each week, equates to a free newspaper each and every day and even delivered to our house to boot! If you save say $5.00 each week at the grocery store, that translates into $250.00 per year. Use more coupons, save even more money.
Walmart's business has done extremely well during these hard times by using a business plan that fits perfectly in these times by having low prices. Their business plan now includes increasing their grocery items. Now subtract the use of coupons on those low prices and voila, those prices are even lower and affordable. You just can't lose.
I have also recently noticed that there are even more and more coupons in flyers for restaurants to entice people to eat at their establishments. These include chain restaurants as well as local places. During down economic times, people will not go out to eat as much as they did previously. Except for using coupons at restaurants for a date, in a new relationship, using coupons makes eating out more affordable. How can you lose?
There are even coupons for maintenance for your car. The coupons include: oil changes, transmission flushes, brakes and mufflers etc. Why pay $29.00 or higher for an oil change when you can pay $18.00?
To me it is a no brainer to use coupons at every available opportunity. It is just common sense to use them.
Til next week. Remember using common sense makes sense and can even save you cents!
Sunday, May 24, 2009
Overtime in Municipalities
Hi Everyone:
Today's blog is about an astounding fact that I have been recently reading about in my local newspaper. In almost every municipality in Westchester and Putnam Counties, in New York State, the top wage earners are not the elected or salaried people, but hourly employees who are eligible for overtime. I was dumbfounded to learn that there are Police Officers and other municipality employees who made up to $150,000 during the last fiscal year. It was not just one person in a given department, there were numerous people in the same department who made well over $125,000. Those are astronomical amounts.
Now don't get me wrong, I believe in the necessity of Police Officers and the other departments that help to give all the services needed to have a safe, clean and effective municipality. But it is painfully obvious that the upper management in the departments as well as the elected officials do not know how to effectively run them. It is also painfully obvious that again, politicians have zero common sense.
Why? If any business had numerous employees in a given department making such incredible amounts of overtime, that doubles their regular pay, year after year, there is a common sense solution to solve this problem. A company would hire X amount of either full time and/or part time employees to relieve the overtime. The part time employees would not cost the company any additional money for benefits and the full time new hires benefit costs would have to be taken into consideration so as to not incur more money then the total overtime costs. How simple is that solution? You would think someone would implement that plan.
Of course there is always a wrench that is thrown into this overtime mess. That wrench is the unions that these employees belong to. When an union employee retires, their last three years of their pay prior to retirement date are averaged to determine what their yearly pension will be. That in itself is a costly problem due to the fact that three years before an employee retires they volunteer for the most amount of overtime that they can get. I personally believe that a different equation should be used to determine what the yearly pension amount should be. Of course that would have to be negotiated with the unions, which would be a very daunting task. Why? The unions would stand on past practices and that's that, period. When a lot of these employees retire after 20 years or at age 55 yes 55, they go on to another career. Then they get their new salary from their new job and they also receive their pension. So, to get around the sticking point of fruitlessly trying to negotiate with the unions, all that needs to be done is to hire more employees to cut the overtime. A simple solution that does not have to be negotiated.
You would think that politicians should know that running a municipality is very similar to running a business and overtime costs are overtime costs and they need to be controlled. Again, politicians need to learn about common sense and how to use it.
Till next week.
Today's blog is about an astounding fact that I have been recently reading about in my local newspaper. In almost every municipality in Westchester and Putnam Counties, in New York State, the top wage earners are not the elected or salaried people, but hourly employees who are eligible for overtime. I was dumbfounded to learn that there are Police Officers and other municipality employees who made up to $150,000 during the last fiscal year. It was not just one person in a given department, there were numerous people in the same department who made well over $125,000. Those are astronomical amounts.
Now don't get me wrong, I believe in the necessity of Police Officers and the other departments that help to give all the services needed to have a safe, clean and effective municipality. But it is painfully obvious that the upper management in the departments as well as the elected officials do not know how to effectively run them. It is also painfully obvious that again, politicians have zero common sense.
Why? If any business had numerous employees in a given department making such incredible amounts of overtime, that doubles their regular pay, year after year, there is a common sense solution to solve this problem. A company would hire X amount of either full time and/or part time employees to relieve the overtime. The part time employees would not cost the company any additional money for benefits and the full time new hires benefit costs would have to be taken into consideration so as to not incur more money then the total overtime costs. How simple is that solution? You would think someone would implement that plan.
Of course there is always a wrench that is thrown into this overtime mess. That wrench is the unions that these employees belong to. When an union employee retires, their last three years of their pay prior to retirement date are averaged to determine what their yearly pension will be. That in itself is a costly problem due to the fact that three years before an employee retires they volunteer for the most amount of overtime that they can get. I personally believe that a different equation should be used to determine what the yearly pension amount should be. Of course that would have to be negotiated with the unions, which would be a very daunting task. Why? The unions would stand on past practices and that's that, period. When a lot of these employees retire after 20 years or at age 55 yes 55, they go on to another career. Then they get their new salary from their new job and they also receive their pension. So, to get around the sticking point of fruitlessly trying to negotiate with the unions, all that needs to be done is to hire more employees to cut the overtime. A simple solution that does not have to be negotiated.
You would think that politicians should know that running a municipality is very similar to running a business and overtime costs are overtime costs and they need to be controlled. Again, politicians need to learn about common sense and how to use it.
Till next week.
Sunday, May 17, 2009
New York City's Mass Transit
Hi Everyone:
Again, there are things that happen that to me make absolutely no sense. It makes me wonder if people, (in this week's case politicians) even know the term and/or what the meaning of common sense is.
If you or I needed money for whatever reason, we would go to a bank and apply for a loan. Except for the financial mess that the banks are in now, (i.e.: sub-prime mortgage fiasco), banks should verify your income and savings etc. Then a determination is made as to the amount of money (loan) you will receive.
It is now very apparent that the above is not the way New York State's government works. Here in New York City, we have the largest mass transit system in the country. It is called the MTA, (Mass Transit Authority) and it consists of: 4 rail lines (Hudson, Harlem, Long Island and Connecticut), a subway system and a bus system. I am not totally sure of the exact number of daily riders, but it is in the millions per day. A few months ago the MTA stated that there was going to be a deficit in their upcoming fiscal year and that fares would have to go up 25%. The 25% fare increase would go into effect unless either the federal and/or NY state governments came up with some additional money that would reduce the fare increase. To make a long story short, at the eleventh hour, the NYS government (in their infinite wisdom) did figure out a way to give additional funding to the MTA that will reduce the fare increase to 10% this year.
Where did this extra money come from? Among other tax increases, the NYS government will impose a payroll tax of $.33 per $100.00 of a company's payroll in NYC and in all of the surrounding counties of NYC. In the counties furthest north of NYC, that the MTA serves, the payroll tax will be $.25 per $100.00. Somehow, supposedly, health care facilities and schools will be reimbursed for the payroll tax that they pay out so as to not increase school taxes or health care costs. I wonder where that money will come from, since NYS has it own deficit of billions of dollars? NYS will also impose a surcharge on all taxi-cab rides. There are other new taxes but that is not the issue that I am talking about today. It seems that the MTA has not been audited in over 40 years. 40 YEARS!!!! The MTA has always received government handouts to keep them afloat, but never been audited? That is without a doubt a travesty and an injustice to not only the riders of the MTA but also to the companies whose employees don't even use the system but will have to help fund it. I would bet anything that the MTA has massive amounts of wasteful spending, maybe even some fraud, but no one knows since they have not and will not be audited.
How can the NYS government increase taxes on all these companies and people based solely on what the MTA's head honchos say? In this day and age, can we really believe what a company like the MTA says as truthful? WHERE IS THE COMMON SENSE here people? NYS should have audited the MTA prior to forking over any additional funding and have the MTA prove that they are running a tight ship and are in need of the funding. Am I crazy here or doesn't that just make common sense to audit them. Better yet, the MTA should have offered to open up their books for a thorough examination. I guess I know the answer as to why they didn't want to voluntarily open up their books; most likely there is massive amounts of money being wasted and the MTA doesn't think it is anybody else's business. How wrong they are and how wrong the NYS government is, in not forcing them to be audited.
Think about this.......maybe a course on common sense should be invented that all politicians and CEO's for that matter, should be mandated to take and pass prior to becoming a politician or CEO. Whoa, what a concept. Enough said.
Until next week.
Remember to use common sense, it will make your life that much easier and better.
Again, there are things that happen that to me make absolutely no sense. It makes me wonder if people, (in this week's case politicians) even know the term and/or what the meaning of common sense is.
If you or I needed money for whatever reason, we would go to a bank and apply for a loan. Except for the financial mess that the banks are in now, (i.e.: sub-prime mortgage fiasco), banks should verify your income and savings etc. Then a determination is made as to the amount of money (loan) you will receive.
It is now very apparent that the above is not the way New York State's government works. Here in New York City, we have the largest mass transit system in the country. It is called the MTA, (Mass Transit Authority) and it consists of: 4 rail lines (Hudson, Harlem, Long Island and Connecticut), a subway system and a bus system. I am not totally sure of the exact number of daily riders, but it is in the millions per day. A few months ago the MTA stated that there was going to be a deficit in their upcoming fiscal year and that fares would have to go up 25%. The 25% fare increase would go into effect unless either the federal and/or NY state governments came up with some additional money that would reduce the fare increase. To make a long story short, at the eleventh hour, the NYS government (in their infinite wisdom) did figure out a way to give additional funding to the MTA that will reduce the fare increase to 10% this year.
Where did this extra money come from? Among other tax increases, the NYS government will impose a payroll tax of $.33 per $100.00 of a company's payroll in NYC and in all of the surrounding counties of NYC. In the counties furthest north of NYC, that the MTA serves, the payroll tax will be $.25 per $100.00. Somehow, supposedly, health care facilities and schools will be reimbursed for the payroll tax that they pay out so as to not increase school taxes or health care costs. I wonder where that money will come from, since NYS has it own deficit of billions of dollars? NYS will also impose a surcharge on all taxi-cab rides. There are other new taxes but that is not the issue that I am talking about today. It seems that the MTA has not been audited in over 40 years. 40 YEARS!!!! The MTA has always received government handouts to keep them afloat, but never been audited? That is without a doubt a travesty and an injustice to not only the riders of the MTA but also to the companies whose employees don't even use the system but will have to help fund it. I would bet anything that the MTA has massive amounts of wasteful spending, maybe even some fraud, but no one knows since they have not and will not be audited.
How can the NYS government increase taxes on all these companies and people based solely on what the MTA's head honchos say? In this day and age, can we really believe what a company like the MTA says as truthful? WHERE IS THE COMMON SENSE here people? NYS should have audited the MTA prior to forking over any additional funding and have the MTA prove that they are running a tight ship and are in need of the funding. Am I crazy here or doesn't that just make common sense to audit them. Better yet, the MTA should have offered to open up their books for a thorough examination. I guess I know the answer as to why they didn't want to voluntarily open up their books; most likely there is massive amounts of money being wasted and the MTA doesn't think it is anybody else's business. How wrong they are and how wrong the NYS government is, in not forcing them to be audited.
Think about this.......maybe a course on common sense should be invented that all politicians and CEO's for that matter, should be mandated to take and pass prior to becoming a politician or CEO. Whoa, what a concept. Enough said.
Until next week.
Remember to use common sense, it will make your life that much easier and better.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Driving
Hi All:
For the past couple of years I have noticed that more and more drivers are doing some pretty stupid moves on the road. Besides the point that some of these moves are illegal, the drivers seem to not care about their safety or anyone else's! Here are my top 10 stupid moves done by drivers. These are not in any particular order.
Stupid Move #1: A car passing you on the left or right side and then immediately pulls into your lane without signaling. The worst move is when they pass you, cut you off and then brake to avoid hitting the car in front of them. What was the point of passing you?
Stupid Move #2: You are traveling down a long hill on a highway and the driver in front of you decides to step on the brakes. What???? There was no one in front of them and I can only guess that doing the speed limit while going down hill was to fast for them. I can't figure out any other reason for them to brake while going down hill.
Stupid Move #3: Traffic is backed up for whatever reason, be it congestion or an accident etc.; there is always some idiot that has to drive on the shoulder to pass however many cars that they can.
Stupid Move #4: Women putting on makeup while driving. Why not put on your mascara, lipstick etc. before you leave your home.
Stupid Move #5: Text messaging while driving. WTH!!!! I can understand talking on a hands-free cell phone because your hands are on the wheel but in order to text you need at least one hand typing on the phone. This also includes talking on a non hands-free cell phone.
Stupid Move #6: Driving to slowly. I have no problem when people drive the posted speed limit, but when they drive 10 or 15 or even 20 mph slower then the speed limit that can be just as dangerous as speeding.
Stupid Move #7: Drivers reading newspapers or books while driving. Why is it so important to read while driving?
Stupid Move #8: A driver drops something on the floor and instead of leaving it there, they bend over to pick it up.
Stupid Move #9: Drivers who do not read the signs for EZ pass lanes prior to paying a toll. They get to the toll and realize that they are in the wrong toll lane, (due to the fact that they do not have EZ pass) and then they have to wait for a police officer because the gate won't raise up.
Stupid Move #10: No matter what the speed limit is, there are always people who pass you going at an incredible rate of speed that you seem to be standing still.
All of these are stupid moves, of which some are illegal, but these moves can and do cause accidents. It is obvious that there are a lot of drivers who either don't have or don't use any common sense while driving. Get with the program people and use common sense while driving.
I will be back on May 15th. Talk to you then.
For the past couple of years I have noticed that more and more drivers are doing some pretty stupid moves on the road. Besides the point that some of these moves are illegal, the drivers seem to not care about their safety or anyone else's! Here are my top 10 stupid moves done by drivers. These are not in any particular order.
Stupid Move #1: A car passing you on the left or right side and then immediately pulls into your lane without signaling. The worst move is when they pass you, cut you off and then brake to avoid hitting the car in front of them. What was the point of passing you?
Stupid Move #2: You are traveling down a long hill on a highway and the driver in front of you decides to step on the brakes. What???? There was no one in front of them and I can only guess that doing the speed limit while going down hill was to fast for them. I can't figure out any other reason for them to brake while going down hill.
Stupid Move #3: Traffic is backed up for whatever reason, be it congestion or an accident etc.; there is always some idiot that has to drive on the shoulder to pass however many cars that they can.
Stupid Move #4: Women putting on makeup while driving. Why not put on your mascara, lipstick etc. before you leave your home.
Stupid Move #5: Text messaging while driving. WTH!!!! I can understand talking on a hands-free cell phone because your hands are on the wheel but in order to text you need at least one hand typing on the phone. This also includes talking on a non hands-free cell phone.
Stupid Move #6: Driving to slowly. I have no problem when people drive the posted speed limit, but when they drive 10 or 15 or even 20 mph slower then the speed limit that can be just as dangerous as speeding.
Stupid Move #7: Drivers reading newspapers or books while driving. Why is it so important to read while driving?
Stupid Move #8: A driver drops something on the floor and instead of leaving it there, they bend over to pick it up.
Stupid Move #9: Drivers who do not read the signs for EZ pass lanes prior to paying a toll. They get to the toll and realize that they are in the wrong toll lane, (due to the fact that they do not have EZ pass) and then they have to wait for a police officer because the gate won't raise up.
Stupid Move #10: No matter what the speed limit is, there are always people who pass you going at an incredible rate of speed that you seem to be standing still.
All of these are stupid moves, of which some are illegal, but these moves can and do cause accidents. It is obvious that there are a lot of drivers who either don't have or don't use any common sense while driving. Get with the program people and use common sense while driving.
I will be back on May 15th. Talk to you then.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)